<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ESOMAR Congress Day 1: A Client Side Highlights Reel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greenbookblog.org/2012/09/11/esomar-congress-day-1-a-client-side-highlights-reel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greenbookblog.org/2012/09/11/esomar-congress-day-1-a-client-side-highlights-reel/</link>
	<description>Charting the Future of Market Research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:14:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricio Pagani</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbookblog.org/2012/09/11/esomar-congress-day-1-a-client-side-highlights-reel/#comment-416842</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricio Pagani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbookblog.org/?p=7334#comment-416842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey June,
Thanks for your feedback. We knew the format would be controversial, but we decided that we wanted to give the audience enough of a &#039;taste&#039; of what they would find inside the paper to make them want to read it.  Our paper was extremely technical and would have typically made for a boring presentation (sample sizes, weighting, etc) and we hoped that people that care about those issues will go to the paper, which got nominated to best paper overall by the judges. 

We received plenty of good feedback on the presentation, mostly along the lines of the &#039;best presentation they&#039;ve ever seen&#039;. For the most part people said they were keen on reading the paper. However, we&#039;ll take it on the chin, as they say and try harder next time.
Feedback is always appreciated.
ciao.
Patricio]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey June,<br />
Thanks for your feedback. We knew the format would be controversial, but we decided that we wanted to give the audience enough of a &#8216;taste&#8217; of what they would find inside the paper to make them want to read it.  Our paper was extremely technical and would have typically made for a boring presentation (sample sizes, weighting, etc) and we hoped that people that care about those issues will go to the paper, which got nominated to best paper overall by the judges. </p>
<p>We received plenty of good feedback on the presentation, mostly along the lines of the &#8216;best presentation they&#8217;ve ever seen&#8217;. For the most part people said they were keen on reading the paper. However, we&#8217;ll take it on the chin, as they say and try harder next time.<br />
Feedback is always appreciated.<br />
ciao.<br />
Patricio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ESOMAR Congress Was A Pivotal Event For MR &#124; GreenBook</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbookblog.org/2012/09/11/esomar-congress-day-1-a-client-side-highlights-reel/#comment-414333</link>
		<dc:creator>ESOMAR Congress Was A Pivotal Event For MR &#124; GreenBook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbookblog.org/?p=7334#comment-414333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of the conference, our own client-side blogger June WestHolland shared her perspective of Day 1 here. ESOMAR has extensive coverage via multiple bloggers on the RW Connect site here and Jon Puleston [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the conference, our own client-side blogger June WestHolland shared her perspective of Day 1 here. ESOMAR has extensive coverage via multiple bloggers on the RW Connect site here and Jon Puleston [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
