<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Market Research Still Exist In 20 Years?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greenbookblog.org/2012/10/01/will-market-research-still-exist-in-20-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greenbookblog.org/2012/10/01/will-market-research-still-exist-in-20-years/</link>
	<description>Charting the Future of Market Research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:46:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Car dealers austin tx</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbookblog.org/2012/10/01/will-market-research-still-exist-in-20-years/#comment-442141</link>
		<dc:creator>Car dealers austin tx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 12:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbookblog.org/?p=7484#comment-442141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think market research plays a significant role when it comes to forming the right business strategy and reaching the target market. It will always remain a part of business.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think market research plays a significant role when it comes to forming the right business strategy and reaching the target market. It will always remain a part of business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbookblog.org/2012/10/01/will-market-research-still-exist-in-20-years/#comment-439184</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 01:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbookblog.org/?p=7484#comment-439184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As long as management needs to know &quot;why&quot; then MR will always be needed.  Big data will not answer why, just how, what and when.  The major argument of behavioural economist like Kahneman and Tversky is that the &quot;why&quot; is the key.  Looking at transactions and demographics and other indicators will never explain real decision making.  You might be able to infer from patterns in data, but when the business  results start to look uninteresting, as they will, management will soon ask &quot;why?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as management needs to know &#8220;why&#8221; then MR will always be needed.  Big data will not answer why, just how, what and when.  The major argument of behavioural economist like Kahneman and Tversky is that the &#8220;why&#8221; is the key.  Looking at transactions and demographics and other indicators will never explain real decision making.  You might be able to infer from patterns in data, but when the business  results start to look uninteresting, as they will, management will soon ask &#8220;why?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonard Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbookblog.org/2012/10/01/will-market-research-still-exist-in-20-years/#comment-437662</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonard Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 19:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbookblog.org/?p=7484#comment-437662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed 100% Edward, thanks! And I think the days of &quot;methodological navel gazing&quot; is quickly approaching, perhaps far faster than we think!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed 100% Edward, thanks! And I think the days of &#8220;methodological navel gazing&#8221; is quickly approaching, perhaps far faster than we think!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edward04</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbookblog.org/2012/10/01/will-market-research-still-exist-in-20-years/#comment-434399</link>
		<dc:creator>edward04</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 20:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbookblog.org/?p=7484#comment-434399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have no idea what methodologies will have traction in 20 years time. I suspect fads will come and go. From the Client-side perpsctive, there&#039;s a consistent, and somewhat distubring perspective gap: MR will continue to thrive ONLY if it can contribute to a business decision in a clear and measurable form. Methodologies are a means to an end, and the options are increasing by the month, it seems. Because technology moves fast, and IP is a complicated issue (witnes Samsung vs Apple) I suspec that the notion of a USP wll prove elusive, and even new techniques will be rapidly re-engineered and sold at different price points. If MR is to thrive, then we have to step up and add business impact value that ohers don&#039;t give; the perceptual value of this needs to be captured. The ivory tower needs to be sales conscious at the very least. One day, methodological discussions will be synonomous with navel gazing. Seems like we&#039;re not there yet though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea what methodologies will have traction in 20 years time. I suspect fads will come and go. From the Client-side perpsctive, there&#8217;s a consistent, and somewhat distubring perspective gap: MR will continue to thrive ONLY if it can contribute to a business decision in a clear and measurable form. Methodologies are a means to an end, and the options are increasing by the month, it seems. Because technology moves fast, and IP is a complicated issue (witnes Samsung vs Apple) I suspec that the notion of a USP wll prove elusive, and even new techniques will be rapidly re-engineered and sold at different price points. If MR is to thrive, then we have to step up and add business impact value that ohers don&#8217;t give; the perceptual value of this needs to be captured. The ivory tower needs to be sales conscious at the very least. One day, methodological discussions will be synonomous with navel gazing. Seems like we&#8217;re not there yet though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is the future of PLM research? &#171; Daily PLM Think Tank Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.greenbookblog.org/2012/10/01/will-market-research-still-exist-in-20-years/#comment-432438</link>
		<dc:creator>What is the future of PLM research? &#171; Daily PLM Think Tank Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 03:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenbookblog.org/?p=7484#comment-432438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of the articles I read few days ago, came to my mind. Navigate to the following link to read the article &#8211; Will Market Research Still Exist in 20 years? by Ben Leet. The topic is [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the articles I read few days ago, came to my mind. Navigate to the following link to read the article &#8211; Will Market Research Still Exist in 20 years? by Ben Leet. The topic is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
