1. RN-GBook-480-60-B2B-Banner-5-16
  2. Greenbook 2
  3. Greenbook-Mobile-6.29.16-
  4. mfour_new_1

Isn’t It About Time Market Research Grew Up?

It could be argued that the shift to ‘new mutuality’ represents a coming of age for market research where the emergence of social media, big data and compelling new offers in the market, forces MR to finally confront the limitations of the traditional paradigms.

 

By Ian Murray

Recent ads in the US for Honda and Hyundai, dramatize a situation that any parent or any adult who has encountered a 4-year- old, knows all too well.

You rate yourself as a knowledgeable, well-balanced and articulate person … but your 3-foot-tall interrogator can strike at any time, humbling you with a relentless and merciless barrage of open-ended questions …

Any kid worth their salt can interrogate with a wide-eyed and ruthless curiosity that no adult can match.

And it is a quality that many market researchers cherish and positively long to recapture.

Indeed at one point I worked at an agency where we built our credentials around the promise that we were “like children asking the fourth and fifth ‘why”’.  We thought this was a pretty good line – we thought it captured our thirst for knowledge and our commitment to discovering the underlying truths of consumer behavior …

To many of our clients – consumer insights, marketing and advertising professionals, struggling to make sense of an increasingly complex world – this sounded pretty good too.

But of course we, along with every other MR agency, were overlooking the needs of some vital participants in the process; those on the receiving end of our insatiable curiosity … the ordinary, unsuspecting people we choose to call ‘consumers’ and ‘respondents’.

Egocentrism and self-orientation 

Inevitably, and thankfully, the kids soon grow out of the ‘questions’ phase. A rapidly developing sense of identity and their place in the world, builds an understanding of cause and effect. The blunt and uncompromising ‘why’s and how’s’ are soon replaced with more apposite conversation, as children learn to relate more fully to other people.

Marketing and research, on the other hand, seems to have become fixated at an early stage of development. We struggle to relate to other people. If we extend the child development analogy, it’s what the developmental psychologist Piaget would have classified as egocentrism – a preoccupation with one’s own internal world.

Taking a more business-orientated view, the guys at business consultancy Trusted Advisor call this ‘self-orientation’.

This egocentrism or self-orientation is manifest in so much of the day-to-day practice of marketing and MR. In marketing, think about how resilient the myth is that people care about brands and advertising. Despite a considerable amount of evidence to the contrary (see Paul Adams’ book ‘Grouped’ for an excellent summary of the literature on this), marketing remains stubbornly predicated on the assumption that people spend a great deal of time thinking and talking about their preferences for brands in their day-to-day lives.

Then look at the length and complexity of the average tracking or segmentation questionnaire, or the convoluted routing and prompts of many discussion guides.

Like the exasperated parent, respondents’ experiences of traditional market research is too often one of being locked into an asymmetrical relationship – badgered by an endless cycle of questions that have little relevance in the real world, outside the bubble of marketing and MR.

The ‘new mutuality’

Of course, there is a rapidly growing ‘NewMR’ movement that is committed to challenging much of this orthodoxy. (For a great summary see Ray Poynter’s #NewMR and his excellent Handbook of Online and Social Media Research).

It could be argued that this movement represents a coming of age for market research where the emergence of social media, big data and compelling new offers in the market, forces MR to finally confront the limitations of the traditional paradigms.

But this transformation is being driven by something much more fundamental than new technologies and methods. Paul Adams describes how the web and therefore marketing, is being ‘rebuilt around people’.

There is an emphasis on a new mutuality between businesses and their customers. See, for example, how IBM talk about the ‘era of the chief executive customer’ and the role of CMOs in giving their firms a ‘new degree of social intelligence and self-awareness’.

New and old MR needs to ‘rebuild around people’

To compete in the emerging landscape, market research needs to support these objectives too.

In his recent blog on the GreenBook site, Tony Cosentino recognizes the many structural challenges that MR faces in achieving the required transformation. But he also argues that there is a deeper ‘perceptual’ issue that is holding the MR industry back. For Cosentino it is simply that MR lacks the confidence to recognize and brand the relevant skills that it has for this new era.

However, to this I would add the apparently ‘hard wired’ tendency to self-orientation as a further, and perhaps even stronger, force of inertia. And it is a force that has the power to afflict NewMR just as readily as the old.

Let’s look at a couple of NewMR examples. On the surface, gamification is a well-intentioned movement to improve the research experience for respondents and, in so doing, improve the quality of insights we gain about their lives. Have a look at this case study from Research Through Gamification. It starts from the incontestable premise that surveys are boring and should be made more interesting.

But does this do anything more than flip the asymmetrical parent / child relationship on its head? This version of NewMR simply repositions marketing and research as the parent dumbing down the questions. Hardly the grown-up and mutual relationship offered by the social media and big data players.

And how about the growing world of Market Research On-line Communities (MROCs)? The tell-tale indicator here is the name. How often does the prospect of rich, organic and mutual engagement constrained as carefully nurtured ‘communities’, become just another panel for the same self-orientated MR questions?

So is the basic practice of market research (i.e. asking questions) incompatible with this new era of mutuality? Of course the answer to this question is ‘no’. Conversation is the basic currency of mutual human interaction. There will always be a need to ask people what they think and listen to their answers. But mutuality requires different questions and a different mind-set.

The transformational idea for all forms of question-based MR is about attitude, not method. Quantitative and qualitative research will continue to have a role not by competing with other data streams, but finding ways to elevate and add value to the increasingly organic conversations that take place between people and business.

Growing pains ahead

To fulfill this role, market research needs to find the self-awareness to anticipate and exploit the gaps in the conversation, and the discipline and confidence to ask only the necessary and relevant ‘grown-up’ questions.

But there are a lot of ‘growing pains’ ahead. Built on business models based on the marking up of fieldwork, for much of the MR industry asking more questions means making more money …

It’s going to take courage and creativity to break this cycle and adapt to the new era of mutuality.

Share
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “Isn’t It About Time Market Research Grew Up?”

  1. Jennifer Nelson says:

    November 28th, 2012 at 3:58 pm

    I love the title and child/egocentrism analogy. But I would also extend the analogy in the call to action in an entirely different direction – it’s time the corporate MR grows into a mature adult = one that can embrace any source (be it old or “new MR”) of “why”/insight into concrete steps that moves the organization to specific business building or profit generating action. One where this grown up knows the broader business operations well enough – and can navigate the influence/decision making paths – that their entire job sucess is built around ACTION, not reporting.

  2. Sriram says:

    December 3rd, 2012 at 7:45 am

    This just gives words to what I was thinking for sometime now. The research that is happening is not giving out anything new to the users of the research and the providers of inputs. Its been going around in circles with the users and the research professionals not willing to break the pattern and time tested methods and questions.

    The providers of input though have become smarter at avoiding the questions and sending research professional in circles.

Leave a Reply

*

%d bloggers like this: